Although the process of wedding photography should be thought of as the photographic production of a person's wedding day, such a way of looking at it is a bit misleading in that it doesn't account for the enormous range of types of wedding photography. This will not shock anyone, of course. If you have seen any recently married couple's lovingly displayed wedding photographys, you will likely have also noticed the lack of more traditional, posed, and some might say rigid portraiture that was rather ordinary only a few years ago.
The substantive change is caused by the changing interests of brides, as well as the speedily changing technologies which can enable a larger range of freedom for the photographers capturing images. Gone are the days of film cameras (to a degree - sure, there are a very small number of photographers using film photographic equipment, but they are a real rarity at this point). Enter digital cameras, where the only cost of snapping an additional image is the wear and tear of the shutter mechanics, and the potential utility is substantial. Now photographers can take pictures for the chance of a great photograph, and not only when the wonderful photograph is staring them in the face.
Most would claim that there are dual important outlooks upon wedding photography at the point of use now - though a significant percentage of photographers find themselves using both, and dipping from the pair. They are:
1. Photojournalistic - This approach is emphasized when the photographer takes it upon herself to document the wedding, rather than pose participants of the wedding. It is 'journalistic' because it is an attempt to tell a story of the day, and not create an artificial and static look at the distinct list of posed pictures.
2. Traditional - This method is most notable when the photographer arranges various parties in particular stances, very typically intently looking directly at the photographic equipment. Candid photos are minimized, and efforts are made to ensure adequate shots.
It is an unusual photographer, of course, that holds tight exclusively in one style, never straying or being lured in by the benefits of the 'other' style. Most common is the intricate blending of the two outlooks, with an emphasis on one over another. These wedding photographers portray a great example of this blending.
Today's brides, and today's photographers alike, have swarmed to photojournalists to capture shots of the ceremony and reception that will have vast meaning for many years to come. These are photos that would not be captured by a photographer who uses only a traditional technique. You can find the top photographers here: Wedding Photographer.
Today's couples usually agree on the real benefit of some posed portraiture - often just before or just after the wedding itself - to capture the loving couple on their meaningful day.
For example, a popular present day approach is to capture a wide variety of candid photographs throughout a wedding, and when posed images are called for - often of just the couple or the complete bridal party - a 'fashion' portrait technique is used to create dramatic posed, and so somewhat traditional, photographs, of the type that you might find in often imitated fashion magazines. Though some claim this approach is something different than the two style mentioned, it is most easily described as a mixture of the two.
Finally, for Photographers: If you are a wedding photographer, interested in gaining more visiblity for your business, wedding photographers are seeking SEO help.
